BEST
PRACTICE TRANSFER Ltd.
Home
About us
Products
Product Pricing
Consulting Services
COURSE AUTHORING:
Sales and Customer Service Training
Safety,
Diversity and operating
procedures Training
Literacy Training
MEDICAL TRAINING:
Why is our Training different?
Terminology and
Transcription Training
Billing and Coding
Training
Terminology and
Transcription Testing
Free medical software
downloads
BEST PRACTICE:
Best practice transfer
Leadership
Coaching and Mentoring
Leadership Management
Training
Performance and
Competency Frameworks
Talent Management and Succession Planning
Diversity and
Discrimination
Learning Management
CONTACT US:
Contact Us
Try a product
Order a product
|
Management and
Leadership – what's
the difference?
- Management is about getting things done, and leadership is about getting others to get things done.
- Managers know the answers, and leaders know the questions
- Managers say "I have made this happen", and a leader's staff
will say "We have made this happen."
- Managers teach, and leaders help people to learn.
- Managers focus on behaviors, and leaders focus on performances.
Today's modern world requires leadership, rather than management control.
Why? The
world is changing too quickly for companies to rely on employees waiting to
do what they
are told or just following procedures. A manager may not be around to tell
staff what to do, procedures may be out of date or the specific situation might never have arisen before.
Leadership is essential to empowering staff to use initiative to make their own
decisions. The initiative they display can also be described as performance
leadership, which brings about the key defining factor for leadership in an
organization - Leadership is a top to front-line organizational performance culture.
Management and leadership skills can also be defined as
follows:
- Management: The skills required to manage people and resources to deliver a
product or service.
- Leadership: The skills required to engage with people and persuade them to
'buy-in' to a vision or goal.
The two skills are necessarily complementary.
Management without leadership will only be effective in a culture of compliance and
conformity. Leadership without management can lead to maverick behaviors.
Real effectiveness comes only from an
appropriate blend of both .
How do you train managers in leadership?
The simple answer is - You can't. Whereas management can be trained as it is a systemic control process with a
theoretical base, leadership management training has to occur experientially
as it is a reactive
cultural performance based on that interactive experience. Talent management
programs address this essential experiential need by identifying cross
functional task assignments that not only improve the scale of an
individual's capability, but also address an individual's leadership
scope capability. (Of course, this is a flawed strategy when 'talent' is
defined by qualification instead performance as you are merely training
your competitor's future managers.) To quote General Colin Powell "Leadership
is the ART of accomplishing more than the SCIENCE of management says is
possible." As with all "art" forms, techniques can be
trained, but the style and motivation to perform must come from within
each individual. Leadership development interventions must therefore be
structured not only to address technical competency (where performance
can be coached), but also to address the alignment of each individual's
personal motivation and life vision (discovered through mentoring) with
the individual's operational role. To
achieve a true leadership culture and a focus on excellence in the
workplace, the myth of the 'natural leader' must be replaced with the
reality of people who 'lead naturally' - and the 'naturally' refers not
to an innate ability within an individual, but to applying behaviors
that are natural to the individual. Natural behaviors cannot be trained,
but they can be significantly influenced through initiatives
that contain learning situations that develop leadership capabilities by
challenging existing behaviors. Great leaders are not great actors. They
understand who they are; what they are; have a strong belief in their
mission and a genuine concern for the welfare of their staff. Within
this definition lies the core strategy of developing leaders. To be
effective, leadership development interventions should not be confused
with management development interventions, and must be designed to grow individual
capability to:
- Understand effective leadership behaviors
- Understand and evaluate the impact of their pre-existing patterns,
beliefs and rules
- Understand and define their interpersonal and communication
strengths and weaknesses
- Understand the critical differences between perception and actuality
- Understand the value of team initiative and performance
- Understand the motivators and stressors of team members
Leadership interventions are strategic in nature, and focus on the
core personal insights required to facilitate the subsequent tactical
management skill-set development interventions that enable the
transition of the strategies into corporate performances.
Best Practice approach to leadership management training
One of the
greatest advantages of identifying
and transferring
best practice
across
your workforce is that it can also be a powerful
tool for developing a true leadership culture in an organization. Once a performance
exception has been identified, the process of best practice transfer
can
engage both management and front line employees in the input to, and the
ownership of an in-house designed training solution.
This
collaborative approach to performance improvement, coupled with the subsequent
solution implementation introduces measurable performance accountabilities for
the whole team, and lays down a performance matrix that can measure bottom
line outcomes and individual team performances that identify intervention
points for leadership management training and effective employee training
programs. Management skill-set skill gaps are easily identified through
performance measurement as the best practice being transferred has already
been benchmarked, and they can be easily evaluated through 360 degree
feedback as being either strategic or tactical failures requiring
intervention. The
critical components of this approach to leadership management training are:
- the insertion of an in-house training course production capability within
the learning and development function
- the design, development and implementation of a IT infrastructure
capable of benchmarking and measuring performance change
- a strategic re-focusing of the
role of trainers to skilled coordinators of subject matter experts and
systemic human performance technology solution developers
To achieve this
strategy, trainers need a fast, simple to use system for defining key
performance indicators; producing training courses specifically targeted at
performance outcomes, and a measurement system that feeds back performance
outcomes to identify course modifications required and identify
performance deficiencies requiring leadership management training.
The
whole team must be trained simultaneously for leadership
management training to be effective. The Best Practice Transfer Ltd. training system
has been
designed achieve this re-focusing of training
capabilities and accountabilities and is simple to use without
scripting or programming knowledge, and makes training
courses in-house in hours instead of weeks.
We offer comprehensive day-rate short-term and
contract long-term point-of-need interim management and leadership development
consulting services to support the cultural, behavioral and infrastructure
changes related to all leadership performance improvement and leadership
management training initiatives.
|