BEST
PRACTICE TRANSFER Ltd.
Home
About us
Products
Product Pricing
Consulting Services
COURSE AUTHORING:
Sales and Customer Service Training
Safety,
Diversity and operating
procedures Training
Literacy Training
MEDICAL TRAINING:
Why is our Training different?
Terminology and
Transcription Training
Billing and Coding
Training
Terminology and
Transcription Testing
Free medical software
downloads
BEST PRACTICE:
Best practice transfer
Leadership
Coaching and Mentoring
Leadership Management
Training
Performance and
Competency Frameworks
Talent Management and Succession Planning
Diversity and
Discrimination
Learning Management
CONTACT US:
Contact Us
Try a product
Order a product
|
|
Learning
Management System
|
| The
Learning Management System (LMS) |
In its
simplest form, a LMS is a benchmark-independent static data capture process
that reports participation in a
learning intervention with information on whether the training was completed and
contains some form of subjective evaluation of the learning such as an exit
survey. While this approach to learning management pays lip service to
accountability and Return On Investment (the trainees completed the
intervention and gave feedback that the training was worthwhile), it is
strategically flawed as the measurement of success is derived from a
singular isolated process instead of integrated performance outcomes. To
achieve performance outcomes, accountability within learning management must
address 4 distinct areas: 1)
Accountability for the performance of the training intervention. 2)
Accountability for the performance of participants in the intervention. 3)
Accountability for the validity of the intervention itself. 4)
Accountability for seamless integration of the new performances into the
organizational structure. The
learning management system can function in isolation to achieve
accountabilities 1 and 2 as the Key Performance Indicators are learning
process related, but needs connectivity to the existing organization
to ensure achievement of accountabilities 3 and 4 as the Key Performance
Indicators here are related to organizational development and bottom line
performance outcomes.
| How our Learning Management System works. |
The scope of the
Learning Management System is not designed to be all-inclusive encompassing
every training activity in a company, but specifically to manage the
accountabilities associated with empowering trainers to produce and
benchmark best
practice transfer interventions developed using the Best Practice
Transfer Ltd. training software.
Every time an employee signs
on and uses a training course, learning and development data is
captured automatically by the Learning Management System. As the
training module templates are designed around performances, the key
benchmark data
collected relates to how each individual trainee would perform in the
real working environment specific to each individual company.
For
safety training and operational procedures training, the Learning
Management System collects benchmark data and presents it through an Employee
Assessment Review accessible by trainers. The review focuses on
answering the questions that need to be asked by trainers and line
management to determine the validity of an intervention. Did trainees
qualify on the intervention? How much time did each trainee take to
complete the intervention, and what are the average training times for
all trainees? What is the total training time used to date for a
trainee, and how much has all training cost?
For
customer-facing training for sales and customer service, an Employee
Coaching Report is generated by the Learning Management System in
addition to the Employee Assessment Review. The coaching report is a
benchmarking tool to help managers maximize the effect of 1:1 and
"work-with" situations by focusing their efforts on the
performances employees need to learn instead of wasting effort on
performances they already know. The coaching report is also a
benchmarking tool for
trainers, as it allows them to determine performance gaps for individual
employees, and recommend to managers relevant training modules
already in the training inventory, or plan new intervention
modules for situations where no benchmark or solution currently exists.
To
aid in budgeting, the Learning Management System collects training spend
data every time an employee signs on to a training intervention. Budget
plans can be pre-set, and an automatically updated current spend against
plan report can be seen at the click of a button.
Employee Assessment
Review
|
The employee assessment review is updated every time an employee uses the training course.
The review shows whether an employee has qualified on a course, the
number of qualification attempts, the time spent for each course measured
against the average time spent by all trainees, the cost of training for
each course and the total training expenditure for the employee.
|
|
An employee coaching report is generated for every employee using the
Sales and Customer Service training system which can be passed to line managers to aid in their coaching and
mentoring activities. The effectiveness of management coaching can
subsequently be measured when the trainees take further courses as the
coaching report will update competencies and skill gaps when demonstrated.
|
|
Just set your monthly
training budgets on the screen, and the training budget report does the
rest. Every time an employee uses the training courses, training spend
is updated automatically and you can see at a glance where you stand.
Monitor under spend and overspend, or change your budget plan at the
click of a button - it's that easy!
|
|
More on Accountabilities
Accountability,
especially in emerging countries within our growing global economy is often
understandably confused with a "big brother" approach to
management. An accountability strategy applied correctly is in fact the
antithesis of this perception. It is simply a question of how
accountabilities are applied and measured in an organizational structure.
If
accountability is applied to personnel, it cannot be based on results. That
will sound pretty scary to senior management, but in a real world, companies
must deal with real situations to succeed. Results are a function of
(Strategic Performances + Operational Performances), and if strategic
performance is flawed, operational performances, even if excellent, will
never produce planned results. Similarly, if the strategic performance is
excellent and operational performances are deficient, planned results will
not be achieved. As results have two different functional accountabilities,
each function must be measurable for its own singular accountability. The
two accountabilities can be defined quite simply. The interpreter of a
theoretical strategic imperative into a tangible strategic initiative is performance
accountable for best effort in structuring a viable change scenario with the
best information available at the time. The interpreter of the strategic
initiative into outcomes is performance accountable for best effort
with the resources available at the time.
Performance
is a function of (Information Knowledge + Application Knowledge + Effort), and this
functional equation requires an associated set of critical interface
accountabilities for the implementation and management of training.
Our
Learning Management System is designed to manage both the L & D training
performance accountabilities, and the learning effort accountabilities of
trainees. The "Decision" and "Action" template strategy
of the Best Practice Transfer Ltd. system allows the capture of Information Knowledge (on which decisions are based), Application Knowledge
(on which actions are based) and Trainee Effort by comparing each trainee to
current benchmark performance and qualification averages and displaying the
results through the Learning Management System.
|
|
|