|
Whilst organizations are not required to have
a formal equality policy in place, it now considered best practice to
mitigate the substantial financial risks associated with the 'No win - No
Fee' litigation mentality now existent in cases of perceived harassment,
discrimination and victimization.
Harassment may include bullying, name calling, making offensive comments
or insinuations, avoiding sitting
or working near to an individual so that they are made to feel unwanted and
isolated, excluding an individual from particular activities, speaking to an
individual in a way that is demeaning or mocking and so on. It may be deliberate or may not be intended to be malicious, but
is nevertheless hurtful. It may not be specifically targeted at an individual but may be
the result of behavior which creates a particular environment or culture.
A culture that, for example, tolerates the telling of religious jokes, the
use of offensive slang in respect of different religions or beliefs or mocks
practices associated with particular religions or beliefs may be
intimidating or hostile.
Victimization within discrimination situations most often occurs to
people who:
- have made a complaint about being discriminated against or
harassed.
- intend to make a complaint about discrimination or harassment.
- have acted or intend to act as a witness or give evidence in support of
another person relating to a complaint about discrimination or
harassment.
Victimization may present in many ways. It may be that individuals are
refused requests for time off, denied promotion or training, ignored by
their manager or colleagues, criticized continually for their work,
‘messed around’ with respect to their work allocation or shift
arrangement/days off and so on.
An organization
may be liable to pay compensation
unless it can show that it really had taken all reasonable steps to prevent
discrimination, victimization and harassment.
By putting a formal equality policy in place, it is made clear to all
employees that harassment, victimization and discrimination will not be tolerated in your
organization, and that action will be taken on any breaches.
All managers, supervisors and employees should be trained in
the content and operating procedures of the Equality Policy, and
training updates should be scheduled as the policy evolves or when
Regulations change. Equality training should be an integral part of employee
inductions, and proof of equality regulations knowledge should be kept in
the employee's records as they could be
personally liable to pay compensation for discrimination, victimization or harassment.
It is important to recognize that anything done by a person in the course of
his employment shall be treated as done by his employer. If an employee is
discriminated against, victimized or harassed at work, the employer is fully liable, even
if the company is completely
opposed to such acts.
In a sentence - Discrimination is unlawful whether it is intentional or not.
Whilst training diversity regulations to prevent
Direct Discrimination is relatively easy, training an understanding
of Indirect Discrimination is far more complicated, as the occurrences of Indirect Discrimination
are often very subtle. What one employee considers as humor, another
employee may consider as harassment or discrimination. For this reason, the
Best Practice Transfer Ltd. Diversity training system uses full audiovisual
situational diversity training to give employees the opportunity to step back and look
through someone else's eyes to gain an understanding of when an off-color
remark crosses the boundary into discrimination. As trainers make the
training modules using staff volunteers, the actual course preparation
provokes pro-active discussion and feedback of real situations that have occurred
in a company's specific work environment that need resolving. The
training simulation modules are made quickly and economically for computer
based training distribution, and the qualification of each employee is
captured and recorded by the built in Learning Management
System. If you need help or advice on setting up or integrating a
discrimination and diversity function in your company, or need to outsource the
production of a solution, we offer consulting
and outsourcing services to assist you from the strategic planning phase through to
implementation and staff training.
Race
Diversity and Discrimination Training
(go to top of page)
A
racial group may be defined by race,
color, nationality (including
citizenship), or national or ethnic origin.
Direct
Discrimination
Direct discrimination occurs when someone is treated less
favorably on
racial grounds. Racial grounds include not only grounds of race but also
those of color, nationality, citizenship, and ethnic or national origin.
The Race Relations Act 1976 makes it unlawful to publish advertisements
that discriminate on racial grounds, or to make arrangements for such
advertisements. Both publishers and advertisers are legally responsible for
ensuring that advertisements are lawful.
The Commission
for Racial Equality's Code of Practice in employment does
however allow exceptions to the Race Relations Act that can be used by organizations
and employers when an obvious business need is evidenced.
Indirect discrimination
Indirect discrimination occurs when
company rules, requirements or conditions
can be
shown to put people from a particular racial group at a
significantly
greater
disadvantage than others, and the rules cannot be objectively justified.
To justify a practice as
non-discriminatory, an employer must show that there is a
real business need for
the practice; it is clearly proportionate to that business need, and there really is no alternative
approach
to meet that business need.
Religion
and
Belief Diversity and Discrimination Training
(go to top of page)The
Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations became effective in
December 2003.
Religion
and belief encompasses not only the religious affiliation of an employee,
but also very importantly, the belief structures associated with that
religious affiliation. An obvious example of belief discrimination would be
expecting non job specific activities using physical contact which is inappropriate for some
beliefs. There
are genuine occupational requirement religious and belief exceptions that
common sense, and the law allows. It is not discriminatory to choose a Roman
Catholic to be the chaplain of a Roman Catholic school, nor is it
discriminatory to require a halal butcher to be a Muslim as this is required
by the Islamic faith. However, all genuine operational requirements can be
challenged, and the burden of proof lies with the
employer who must produce evidence to justify the requirement.
Direct
discrimination Direct
discrimination occurs when an action occurs that disadvantages a
person based on their religion or belief. (Note:
Indirection discrimination normally relates to procedures that
disadvantage people.)
When
dealing with employees, it is essential to focus on the
skills and abilities required for the employment
and avoid taking action on criteria which are not genuinely needed for
the job and may disadvantage people because of their religion or belief.
Recruitment and promotion are the two most obvious areas where direct
discrimination can occur (or be perceived to occur.) Information about religion or belief should not be sought
where it is irrelevant to the decision-making process unless it is relevant
to the duties of the post. However,
it is not discriminatory to make it clear to candidates for employment or promotion
what the duties of the post involve, (such as the unavoidable
handling of pork products or the unpredictability of the timing of crisis
meetings,) so that they can consider
whether it might conflict with their religion or beliefs.
Indirect
discrimination
Whilst
most responsible companies have diversity procedures in place to deal with direct
religion and belief discrimination, indirect discrimination is a veritable
minefield. As discrimination is unlawful whether it is intentional or not,
short of employing a board of religious and belief advisors from every faith
existent in your culture, it is inevitable that religion and belief
discrimination will occur. Ignorance is no defense, but implementing an
honest open communication channel with a direct contact in HR with the power
to react immediately to unintentional discrimination is a significant
mitigating factor in determining diversity liability and demonstrates your corporate
commitment to religion and belief diversity.
With
this in mind, the
Best Practice Transfer Ltd. Diversity training system is designed to quickly
create volume training solutions whenever unintentional discrimination is
identified and to disseminate this best practice throughout the company.
In a
multi-cultural society, the fast resolution of perceived religion and belief
discrimination practices is essential for the well-being of an organization
and for the prevention of an escalation of small sensibility offences into a
perceived pattern of discrimination.
Gender
Diversity and Discrimination Training
(go to top of page)The
two pieces of legislation in Great Britain which make provision relating to
discrimination on the grounds of sex are the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 and
the Equal Pay Act 1970. They apply equally to women and
men.
The Sex Discrimination Act makes it unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against an applicant for a job
or an employee on
grounds which include their sex or marital status:
This occurs where someone is treated less
favorably
on the ground of his/her sex than a person of the opposite sex is or would be treated.
Direct Discrimination
Examples of direct sex discrimination would be
- Creating a job specification
specifically for a man or for a woman.
- Failing to
promote
a woman on the ground of her sex, where she met
the job criteria as well as a man who was promoted.
- Giving a job to a single woman rather than a married woman as the job
requires extensive travel.
Indirect Discrimination
Indirect sexual discrimination occurs when
an employer applies a condition, criterion or practice
which would apply equally to a person of the opposite sex, but when:
It is applied to a woman and:
- would be to the detriment of a considerably larger
proportion of women than men
- which
cannot
be shown to be justifiable irrespective of
the sex of the person to whom it is applied
- which is to her detriment.
It is applied to a man and:
- would be to the detriment of a considerably larger
proportion of men than women
- which
cannot show to be justifiable irrespective of
the sex of the person to whom it is applied
- which is to his
detriment
Harassment
Gender or Sexual harassment constitutes any unwelcome behavior of a sexual
nature.
What may seem like an innocent action or remark to one person may be seen as
offensive by another and the law sides with the 'victim' not the 'perpetrator'.
The test of whether harassment has occurred is in the determination of how the
recipient feels about the behavior. Whilst men are subjected to sexual
harassment, the vast majority of cases have been by women against men. It is
estimated that 50% of women in employment are, or have been, subject to sexual
harassment of some form or other. Harassment does not occur just in large
offices. It can happen to people in any occupation, to any age group and from
every community.
Harassment can take place in many forms, but falls broadly into 3 groups:
Verbal harassment
- Comments about appearance, body or clothes
- Indecent remarks or jokes
- Questions or comments about someone's sex life
- Requests or demands for sexual favors
- Promises or threats concerning a person's employment in return for sexual favors
Non-Verbal harassment
- Looking or staring at a person's body
- Display of sexually explicit materials
Physical harassment
- Unwanted touching, pinching, hugging, caressing, kissing
Sexual Orientation
Diversity and Discrimination Training (go to top of page)
Whilst
the general principles of sexual orientation discrimination are similar to
gender discrimination, there is often a higher aggravating factor of
harassment that primarily effects indirect discrimination. The reaction to
perceived 'immorality' is often deeply ingrained and conditioned from birth,
and will always be present in the workplace. Whereas gender discrimination
is often due to a lack of sensitivity, sexual orientation discrimination is
often pro-active and expressed through harassment. This causes particular
problems for employers as "anything done by a person in the course of
his employment shall be treated as done by his employer." If an employee is
discriminated against or harassed at work, the employer is fully liable, even
if the company is completely
opposed to such acts.
The Best Practice Transfer Ltd. diversity training
system is designed not only to educate employees about unacceptable
discriminatory actions, but also to keep a record of provable diversity knowledge of
accountability that can be referenced to job specifications. Although no
record of accountability will prevent discriminatory and harassment actions,
it will however enable a company to take appropriate action up to and
including dismissal when employees violate diversity laws.
Sexual Orientation Harassment
is unwanted behavior based on known or presumed sexual orientation. Such behavior includes name calling, stereotyping, assault, verbal abuse, actual
or threatened unwanted disclosure of sexuality, derogatory comments,
excluding same-sex partners from social events or intrusive questioning
about a person’s domestic circumstances.
Age
Diversity and Discrimination Training
(go to top of page)
Age discrimination should not be confused with a 'be fair to older
people' mandate. It applies to people both young and old. If a promotion is
available and it is offered to an older person when a younger person has
better skills and abilities, then age discrimination has taken place and an
employer is liable for for remedy as an unlawful diversity act has been committed. The
key to mitigating age discrimination liability lies in precisely defining
skills and abilities that are relevant to a task today instead of making the
discriminatory assumption that a length of experience or a future planned
expansion of a task should be a considered factor in the decision making
process. The Best Practice Transfer Ltd. Learning Management System is
designed to keep a precise record of competencies, skills and abilities to
enable decisions to be made objectively on measured capability and mitigate
the risks associated with subjective assumptions. The
law, which was amended in 2004, now covers employers of all sizes (previously,
it only applied to those with 15 or more staff)
and it applies to all occupations with the exception of the armed forces.
Direct Discrimination
The Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 make it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against an
applicant for a job or an employee on grounds based on that applicants age:
- In arrangements for determining who should be offered
employment, training or promotion.
- In terms on which employment is offered (with
exceptions).
- By refusing or deliberately omitting to offer
employment or training.
Direct
discrimination occurs when someone is treated less favorably on the ground of
their age.
When recruiting, the regulations prohibit job advertisements that
contain phrases which could be related to age. Examples would include 'applicants
should be 20-30 years of age' or the more subtle use of words like 'mature'
or 'experienced.' As well
as language considerations, recruiters must also be aware of hidden messages
in advertisements such as any pictures used and must also ensure
that advertisements are accessible to a wide age range audience.
In the workplace, an example of direct discrimination would be when a
company has a practice of only promoting people under 50 years of age to
senior positions.
Indirect Discrimination
This occurs where a rule, requirement or condition appears to be
fair because they apply equally to everyone, but put people
from a particular age group or of a particular age at a much greater
disadvantage than others, and the rules cannot be objectively justified.
An example of indirect age discrimination would be when a company
introduces a fitness test which all employees are required to pass, as this
could discriminate against older employees. However, reasonability applies,
and if the fitness test was required to meet health and safety regulations
and there was no less discriminatory way of meeting the regulations, then no
discrimination occurs.
Age
Harassment
Harassment, or bullying based on someone's age is
unlawful. The legal definition of harassment is: unwanted conduct, on the
grounds of age, which has the purpose or effect of violating a person's
dignity, or creating an intimidating, humiliating or offensive environment
for that person.
It is also unlawful to harass someone on the grounds of the
age of someone they associate with.
Disability
Diversity and Discrimination Training
(go to top of page)
The Disability Discrimination Act
of 1995 (amended in 2004 and 2005)
states that employers cannot discriminate against a disabled person when
recruiting, promoting, dismissing or making redundant members of staff on the
grounds of their disability.
Discrimination also occurs when an employer fails to make a 'reasonable
adjustment' in relation to a disabled staff member. Reasonable means in
proportion to the specific circumstances and situation, balancing the costs
involved and an employer's resources. Reasonable adjustments are actions
that an employer takes to ensure an employee or job applicant is not
substantially placed at a disadvantage compared to others. This could
include adjustments to staff training, the recruitment process or staff
benefits or the modification of equipment, including changes to the
premises, adjusting or adding flexibility to work patterns and rest breaks
and giving employees time off to attend medical appointments or for
recuperation.
What
counts as disability?
The Act defines a disabled person as someone who has:
"a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and
long-term adverse effect on the person's ability to carry out normal
day-to-day activities". This is meant to be a fairly wide definition
and includes:
-
physical impairment -
this includes weakening or
adverse change of a part of the body caused through illness, by accident
or from birth. For example, amongst many other situations,
blindness, deafness, heart disease, the paralysis of a limb or severe
disfigurement.
-
mental impairment -
this can include learning
disabilities and all
recognized
mental illnesses.
-
substantial -
this does not have to be severe, but is
more than minor or trivial.
-
long-term adverse effect -
that has lasted or is likely
to last more than 12 months.
-
a normal day-to-day activity -
that is, one that
affects one of the following: mobility; manual dexterity; physical
co-ordination; continence; ability to lift, carry or otherwise move
everyday objects; speech, hearing or eyesight; memory or ability to
concentrate, learn or understand; or perception of the risk of physical
danger. It does not include the ability to work because no particular form
of work is 'normal' for most people.
Reasonable diversity adjustments while in employment:
- Giving or arranging training and equipment
(for example speech recognition software)
- Providing a reader or interpreter
(for example a
sign language interpreter for a deaf employee)
-
Acquiring or modifying equipment
- Modifying instructions or reference manuals (for example providing
an oral version)
- Altering working hours (for example adjusting working hours
for
a person who takes medication which has side effects worse in the morning)
- Allocating some of the disabled person's duties to another person
(for example tasking a colleague to
perform high tasks for a person in a wheelchair)
- Transferring and
training a
person who becomes disabled
to fill an existing vacancy
- Assigning the disabled person to a different place of work
(for
example allowing
home working during a period of rehabilitation)
-
Allowing absence during working hours for rehabilitation assessment or
treatment
-
Adjusting premises (for example to allow wheelchair access)
(go to top of page)
To sum up, a true diversity policy reflects your corporate ethos. It is not
enough to passively pay lip service to diversity by training recognition of
discrimination. True diversity training must honestly and pro-actively address
the individual, unrecognized, ingrained prejudices and behaviors that exist in
every organization by holding up a mirror. That mirror is simulation.
If you need help or advice, we offer comprehensive consulting
and outsourcing services to
guide you through the strategic planning, implementation, integration and staff
training requirements of setting up a diversity and discrimination function. Diversity and Discrimination training MUST be pro-active.
|